Gendercide in China
Females in China are constantly bombarded with the sexist
injustices put into place by the patterns of tradition. Female gendercide, a practice which evolved in
China from the Chinese government’s one-child policy, is the killing of females,
especially as infants and babies, in favor of males. Chinese families prefer sons for numerous
reasons:
1.
Traditional families share a preference of sons
over daughters (The Economist).
2.
Males’ physical abilities allow them to assist
his family in manual labor – a profession usually avoided by women (Whiteford).
3. A family’s son will continue the family’s line
and take care of his elders in old age (The
Economist).
Below are some important facts
about gendercide in Chinese society:
·
Since 1949 – thirty years before the
installation of the one-child policy, gendercide, as well as infanticide, among
females has been common (Fitzpatrick).
·
In 1979, the Chinese government put into place
its one-child policy, restricting most families to only a single child, and
gendercide became even more popular (Fitzpatrcik).
·
In China, the female infants and fetuses
victimized by gendercide are most often killed by abortion or infanticide
(Bojang).
In January of 2012, the Chinese Academy
of Social Sciences (CASS) conducted a study of the long-term effects of female
gendercide in China. The following
include the results of this study:
·
In 2020, ten years after the study was
conducted, one in five Chinese men will be unable to find a wife (The Economist).
·
In that same year, it is also highly probable
that China’s population will be equal to the young male population of America
as a result of the subsequent diminishing of China’s female population (The Economist).
·
The norm of sex ratios lies between 103 and 106
males born for every 100 females born.
In 2010, China’s sex ratio was 123 males born to 100 females (The Economist).
·
As sex ratios in China increase, crime rates
rise as well. Many of these crimes
concern women: “bride abduction, the trafficking of women, rape and
prostitution” (The Economist).
No comments:
Post a Comment